It was just time mistake, Prodigy your team gathered one hour earlier when we planned. That’s why we haven’t come. Our time decision was 18:00 GMT. (6 p.m.) Look at your post time, Its 5.26 p.m. Never mind, its easy to miss the time. I am always, falling out with it. Hope we could play our match next time. I wish you good luck with our International branch at Sunday. You have to fight harder. Its going to be more interesting,
Nightwish, as I promised if your branch win it, You re going to the highest rank.
I understand that ... but I wish to play this match with a mix-up 8 players, at least 3 from each branch. I was thinking like this: Warrior: Borbel and Sinner Priest: Tarzan_dma and Torsten Assasin: i R Fuzz Archer: R2D2 Mage: (Fade, BloodRaven or tooBlind) As for me, I'd like to take place as second archer or second mage ... but I prefer second archer (they don't have second mage, but they have second assasin ... so I think we should have second archer) -If, you don't like this idea, I should find some more players (as I couldn't find much till now), and I would ask you, that you give us Torsten for the match (all healers are absent) -I prefer mix-up ... as for my rank, we can play TM some other day after CW Pls Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are wrong.
-Well, I think this match was sorta ok, but A-Omega want a rematch. -We won first round with 3:0 on 7 vs 7 -Second round we also won with 5:0 on 7 vs 7
I don't realy think they put all the effort in their gameplay today ... but hey, you're a new clan, you'll get better
Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are wrong.
Well we won 2 rounds with score 1 round 3-0 second round 5-0 and last round was never played because reboot after half round and after that 4 player totally rejoined but we won ( or if not we replay it )
Added (2007-11-25, 8:14 Pm) --------------------------------------------- not 1 ( first round )
Eh, you're coming back, wiii and soon Dwarfbier will come too wiiiipiii Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are wrong.
wiiiipiii